Get Adobe Flash player

The Global Warming Con To Produce A Global Governance

The global warning issue is not about temperature…it is about government control–world-wide government control.  This is all part of the effort to centralize control over mankind, which is exactly what the Bible declares and is written about in the book Revelation, Apostasy, End-Times, & “This Generation”Target Truth Ministries.com.

November 29, 2017 saw a report issued by lead author Christy published in the Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences.  Basically it provides scientific evidence that over the past 23 years there has been NO acceleration in global warming like the international community keeps warning of.  Using actual satellite data, they prove that all the hysteria over global warming is created by deliberate manipulation of all the evidence.  The purpose, of course, is to create a need for global government to save us.

July 5, 2017 saw a report in the “Daily Caller” exposing the “adjustments” being made to data to increase the levels of warming being reported by NASA, NOAH, and the UK’s Met Office.  Evidently, by removing previously existing cyclical temperature patterns (such as the 1940’s warming patterns), the data sets show greater warming “trends” than the real time thermometers actually record.  The June 27th pier reviewed report was made by Cato scientist Craig Idso, and statisticians James Wallace and D’Aleo.

The issue / theory is supposedly that too much carbon dioxide from mankind is the cause of global warming trends.   Early on in 2017, President Trump signed legislation to ease carbon restrictions which was supposedly in conflict with the theory of man-caused global warming.  Also, in December 2016, Breitbart News found itself in conflict with the New York Times science article on climate change and global warming.  The New York Times was stating that Breitbart News had drawn incorrect conclusions from the recent science articles linking El Nino and La Nina to climate change…all related to levels of carbon dioxide, and man-made climate change.  What is the truth?  Is man causing global temperatures to rise, or is there some natural occurrence causing temperatures to change?

Actually, there is no scientific evidence that carbon dioxide levels going up result in higher temperatures.  In fact…scientifically,  just the opposite is true!  As a Christian Pastor, I’m very aware of our need to care for God’s creation, both the planet and the babies.  Also as a Christian Pastor I’m very aware of the end of the book–Revelation–and how global governance will be in motion.  Both the global warming debate, as well as the issue of too many babies, are efforts to globalize issues and the need to centralize power to deal with these supposed problems.  Both of these issues are not “problems.”  I deal with the issue of the need for babies in the book “Eden to Evil, as well as a Message titled “Stop the Babies”–Target Truth Ministries.com.   As to the issue of global warming please see below…

Global Warming:  Or, should I say…”Global Freezing?”  When I was in my mid-thirties, the issue of the day was the great freeze the earth was about to enter.  Newspapers, magazines, TV, and radio all presented scientific evidence calling for the world’s governments to clamp down on people and control the environment to avoid a global freeze, where millions and millions of people would die.  Some scientists linked the global freeze problem to the sun’s solar radiation and natural causes (like volcanic activity), while other scientists linked the freeze problem to man-made environmental issues which government should control.  Evidence from both scientific worldviews came in, but nothing could be fully developed, because after ten years, the freeze issue defrosted as temperatures “normalized.”

That was in my thirties…now I’m in my seventies, and the scientific issue for the world is Global Warming.  Once again, the science is divided into two camps.  One worldview is that the global temperatures “were” warming (but haven’t been since the year 2000), and this was due to solar activity and natural causes.  The other worldview is that warming is continuing and is due to man-made environmental causes (carbon dioxide emissions), which government needs to control.  The science seems very convincing on both sides, depending upon what your worldview is.  If you want government to control the industrial complex more, you tend to accept the science calling for a crack-down on man’s activities.  If you are suspicious of more government control, you tend to be suspicious of their scientific claims, and instead, look to other scientists which claim evidence shows that natural causes (sun spot patterns), not man-made causes, are the reason for any global warming…or cooling for that matter.

But…which is really true?  There is so much money pushing for government control of people, that their scientific claims almost suffocate the minority report of naturalism–money talks.  Science has established a “loose” correlation between increases in carbon dioxide and temperatures rising, but this correlation is not by any means always true.  In recorded history, sometimes the temperature has gone up when carbon dioxide levels are low, and sometimes the temperature is low when carbon dioxide levels are high.  Still, the accepted wisdom is that government controlling mankind will be able to control the temperature—with enough money, of course.

Also, Scientists such as (a short list)…Prof. Elgil Friis-Christensen of the Danish Space Center, Prof. Richard Lindzen of MIT Meteorological, Prof. Patrick Michaels with IPCC, Environmental Science from Univ. of Virginia, Prof. Syun-Ichi Akasofu of International Arctic Research Cntr., Dr. Tim Ball Climatologist with Univ. of Winnipeg, Prof Nir Shavi Physics dept. Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Prof. Ian Clark Earth Scientist with Univ. Ottawa, Prof. John Christy IPCC Scientist, Prof Philip Scott Biogeographist with Univ. of London…

…state that scientists referred to the climate for over a hundred years around the 14th century as “The Little Ice Age.”  Before that, during the Medieval Warm Period, the temperatures were even higher than they are today…and, further, for several thousand years before that, during the Holocene Maximum, temperatures were even higher still.  Further, during the last 120 years, during the years before WWII, when use of fossil fuels and industrial production was low, the temperatures were high.  Then, years after WWII, when industrial production ballooned, the temperatures fell (creating the fear of global freezing right into the 1980’s).

It would seem that carbon dioxide, industrial production, and global temperatures have nothing to do with each other.  Is there even more conclusive scientific evidence?   YES!

  • Science knows that upper layers of Earth’s atmosphere should have increased temperature levels compared to Earth’s surface temperature if greenhouse gases are causing temperature increases.  The atmosphere temperatures should be higher relative to the surface.  However, just the opposite is being measured by science.  Scientific evidence shows the surface of the earth is rising faster relative to the atmosphere.  In other words, science has concluded that greenhouse gases are not the cause of any current increase or decrease in surface temperatures of the earth.  Further, this correlation between earth’s temperature and carbon dioxide is not by any means always true.  In recorded history, sometimes the temperature has gone up when carbon dioxide levels are low, and sometimes the temperature is low when carbon dioxide levels are high.
  • Ice core data, which goes back hundreds and thousands of years, actually shows that carbon dioxide increases always follow surface temperatures.  So, while it is correct to say that global warming and carbon dioxide levels many times follow each other, the actual evidence shows that when this happens, it is the surface temperature which goes up first…and the carbon dioxide levels go up after the surface temperatures rise.  Scientists know that when ocean temperatures rise they release carbon dioxide.  In fact these releases of carbon dioxide exceed all industrial production.  So, first the temperature goes up, and then the carbon dioxide is released, raising the levels in the atmosphere.  When the ocean cools, it captures carbon dioxide.  The surface temperature always leads the process…it never follows the levels of carbon dioxide.
  • Scientific evidence shows that the only thing that correlates consistently with global warming and cooling is Sun activity. Science has shown that high solar activity results in higher global temperatures, and lower solar activity results in lower global temperatures.
  • New scientific evidence points to atmospheric pressure having a link to increasing global temperatures. Atmospheric pressure is influenced by oxygen levels and solar activitynot carbon dioxide.  You probably won’t hear of these scientific studies, but they are published in the scientific academic papers (Christopher Poulsen and Clay Tabor, University of Michigan Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences; Joseph White, Baylor University Dept. of Biology; Daniel Peppe, Baylor University Dept. of Geology Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research; and Dana Royer, Wesleyan University Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences).

How is it possible that science funding has drifted so far from hard scientific data and evidence?  This whole issue began with carbon dioxide and the issue of clean air.  Nothing wrong with controlling pollution of our air.  But, believe it or not, conservative Margret Thatcher used the issue of carbon dioxide to drive an agenda of wanting nuclear power plants to solve the problem of always having the coal mining unions disrupting commerce with strikes for higher wages.  At this same time, left wing environmentalists joined with Margret Thatcher in an effort to push against capitalism.  Carbon dioxide levels were linked to both pollution, and to global temperatures.  At the time the scientific theory was that carbon dioxide levels were responsible for the global freeze everyone feared, but over the years these levels became linked to rising temperatures.  The government involvement meant that taxpayer funds could be used to provide data to promote the agenda.  There was lots of money available.  And, if you wanted to receive government funding for any scientific project, you had to link it to carbon dioxide and climate change.

Studies showing that the global temperatures either going up or down were related to sun activity didn’t create headlines or monetary support, because solar scientific data pointed to natural causes (the sun), which will not generate any revenue for government, and cannot be used to control businesses or unions, because government cannot control the sun, etc.  No revenue to be gained by government and business means no dollars for more extensive research. So, research dollars went only to areas supporting linking temperatures to greenhouse gases…carbon dioxide.

Even so, even these studies found a historical direct correlation between solar activity, atmospheric pressure, and oxygen (not carbon dioxide), being the cause of  increases in global temperature…and the correlation with solar activity turns out to be in exact agreement with the changes in global temperatures up and down, over eons of history.

Yet, even as this data is being published, the world is advancing on an agenda to put more controls on man’s activities, thus, raising money for research to prove just the opposite of where the scientific evidence is actually pointing.  Perhaps you can understand my hesitation on trusting too much in science…especially theoretical, hypothetical science generated by government funding.  Call me when the hard evidence is in, and when the scientific community is in agreement.

My book titled Science, Origins, and Ancient Civilizations—Scientific Evidence Withheld from School Textbooks, shows how all areas of science have been effected by governmental involvement in research and education.   The book “Revelation, Apostasy, End-Times & “This Generation” deals with the end time events, which includes a global governance.

 

One Response to The Global Warming Con To Produce A Global Governance

  • Mike Smith says:

    Good article Gerry,

    In the third paragraph, last sentence, you need to change the spelling of one word: “peer”, not “pier”.

    We absolutely agree with what you have here. Good job.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *